A November New York State casino referendum for voters has one lawyer questioning the ballot’s wording
In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote for a referendum that could enable several new casino resorts to be built throughout the state. But if one Brooklyn lawyer is effective, that referendum will be halted due to language in the ballot question he claims violates state law.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum features a quantity of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposition in an unmistakably positive light. For example, the concern mentions ‘promoting job growth, increasing aid to schools and allowing regional governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was approved by their state Board of Elections in July.
But now, lawyer Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York legislation. Based on case filed within the ny State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the continuing State Constitution’s prohibition on the use of general public profit the aid of ‘private undertakings.’
‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you can’t use money that is public sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the only one who has had up problems with the language within the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also view it as one-sided, and religious groups have also noted the language used when telling parishioners to consider social ills that could come along with the advertised benefits of casino expansion.
Interestingly, the initial language in the referendum did not mention any of the benefits which can be set to seem in the final ballot question. Whenever the first draft arrived from their state attorney general’s office, the language was more direct and didn’t are the legislative purposes. Those showed up only after the Board of Elections changed the wording, after exactly what co-chairman Douglas Kellner said had been ‘extensive conversations.’
Wording Can Affect Outcome, Historically Speaking
The language of the ballot question might seem such as a trivial thing to battle over, but history has shown time and again that even minor changes to the title or wording of legislation might have a major effect on public opinion, and which has proven real yet again in this case.
According to a poll by Siena university, 55% of the latest York voters were in favor of the referendum when these people were read issue as it is scheduled to show up on the 5 ballot, with 42% opposed november. But when voters were instead expected a question that is similar more neutral language, they certainly were evenly split on the matter.
That ‘advocating language’ is really what Snyder who additionally opposes casino expansion actually states should cause the court to enjoin voting on the bill until more neutral language was place in its spot.
‘It is partisan, and an effect is being had by it,’ Snyder stated. ‘And that is not the federal government’s part.’
The success of the referendum is in some doubt regardless of the language used despite the promising poll numbers. Without any elections that are statewide for November, turnout is probable to be low in many towns. However in new york, a contested mayor’s race will probably lead to higher turnout there and voters within the city tend to be more skeptical about the casino expansion than voters in all of those other state.
For Tribal Gaming Lobby, it’s really a row that is tough Hoe in Congress
Scenes such as this one, of tribal gaming lobbyists working their issues in Congress, aren’t producing results that are many days
An lot that is awful of are unhappy with the direction or absence thereof of the United States Congress this year. You can now add Native American tribes that operate gambling enterprises across the nation to that particular list that is long.
No Respect in Congress for Tribal Issues
Discussing the lack of any legislation that is federal clarify and regulate the new relative Wild West that is state-by-state online gambling in the U.S. these days, John Gusik a founding partner for the Washington D.C.-based legislation and government relations services outfit called the Franklin Partnership, had this to say at the recent Global Gaming Expo (G2E) in Las Vegas: ‘There happen 4,500 bills in Congress this year; only 31 have been enacted. It is a do-nothing Congress. Seventy-two bills dealing with tribal issues and none were enacted. Web gaming continues to languish in Congress.’
Whilst the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 established the framework for Native casinos that are american benefit this until-then underclass economically, it has not all been champagne and roses for many associated with tribes, who still grapple with basic problems such as better education and health care because of their members. And now as legal online poker in Nevada and imminently, legal Internet casino gambling in New Jersey and Maryland just take hold the Indian ‘special nation’ status vis a vis casinos are threatened, specially as gambling industry executives warn of impending market saturation throughout most of the U.S. that will affect the whole marketplace.
Demonstrably, all the drama surrounding wellness care and also the government shutdown hasn’t exactly helped put concentrate on Indian casino industry issues either.
Casino Money Isn’t Enough, Lobbyists Insist
The nationwide Indian Gaming Commission showed $27.9 billion in gaming revenues in 2012, which is up 2.6 percent from $27.2 billion in 2011, and so the tribes may have trouble garnering sympathy that is much anyone in a still unsteady economy, but lobbyists says there is much more at stake for the tribes than simply revenue.
‘If you represent tribes, they think you must work on Indian gaming on a regular basis,’ said Pete Kirkham, who runs Red Maple Consulting, a federal government affairs and political strategy firm, and works together many of the tribes on different legislative issues. ‘ Gaming takes up some right time but it is also about wellness care, education and housing.’
Kirkham says they are nevertheless waiting on 13 appropriation bills that the tribes requirement for funding. He says that while almost all of tribal income is gaming-derived, that much of it goes directly back into the community.
‘Everything is now seen through the prism of gaming,’ said Jana McKeag, president of Lowry techniques, an Alexandria, Va., government and public affairs firm that is consulting. ‘Congress believes that tribes have all this video gaming money … why do they need (federal dollars)?’
Other problems that tribal lobbyists want addressed involve the profusion of off-reservation casinos in areas where those gambling enterprises might take company far from the Indian people. Furthermore, the proliferation of Web cafes in states like California, Florida, and vermont are seen as an issue the gaming that is entire must address.
‘In California, as an example, they have been illegal but the state doesn’t have cash to shut them down,’ McKeag noted in the G2E panel. ‘They play lobstermania slot online are not regulated and are an window of opportunity for cash laundering. The problem is should they shut them down, they just pop up somewhere else.’
Meanwhile, with every thing taking place in Congress right now, it willn’t look like tribal gaming dilemmas are likely to move to the front of the line anytime soon.
Gambling enterprises Ready to Add Nostalgia-Based Skill Games to Their Rosters
Slot manufacturer IGT has reintroduced the Centipede that is old game slots to tap to the nostalgia craze
They offer, casinos are usually careful to limit just how much players can affect the games through their own skill when it comes to the games. Sure, blackjack and video poker offer players the chance to make skillful choices, but also perfect play still leaves the casino with a tiny advantage (and if you overcome that through card counting, they could always just stop letting you play). Many other games, like slots, are completely based on random luck.
Everything Old is New Again
But with casinos seeking new avenues with which to attract clients, it seems like skill-based gaming may be coming to a venue towards you. That’s the word from the gaming that is global (G2E), where manufacturers had been showing off games that allow players to make use of their skills in an attempt to offer them a better opportunity to win cash.
The biggest hit that had been seen at G2E in this genre is a machine developed by International Game Technology. IGT has made a machine based on the 1981 hit arcade game Centipede, in which players shoot digital bugs in order to score points.
Centipede ended up being originally developed by Atari, an ongoing company that has long since passed its heyday. But IGT along with other manufacturers are hoping to cash in for a wave of nostalgia that could lure middle-aged gamblers whom have fond memories of playing early games that are arcade.
In the casino version of Centipede, the points that players score could be directly translated into money. Needless to say, the casino nevertheless wants to have the advantage, which means you’ll need to get lucky to get into bonus rounds and even the absolute most player that is skilled be an underdog in the long run against the casino.
Playing Against Other Players on Devices
But that isn’t where games like Centipede plan on stopping. The equipment also permits two players to go head-to-head on the machines, using the better player walking away aided by the winnings. That’s a real battle of skill, just like exactly how players can fulfill each other at the poker table, with the casino taking only a cut that is small ensure they profit.
Middle-agers aren’t the ones that are only IGT and other manufacturers (WMS and Aristocrat both say they have skill-based games in the works) are hoping that these games can pull in; these businesses also want to lure younger players to slot machines, which traditionally were the bailiwick of an older demographic. A couple of new games by Bally Technologies leader that is even incorporate in order to try and get players back within the habit of wanting high scores.
‘The casino would love it if players are like, ‘Oh, I got beat! I have to return back and play some more to get into the lead,” stated Bally spokesman Mike Trask. ‘if they were 15 years old in 1985 playing against their friends, trying to get the score that is highest, that person is almost 50 years old now, and so they’re right in the demographic.’
Others think that the important thing will be matching players for head-to-head skill competitions with money on the line. It has become a reality in online game titles, and some see casinos could perform some thing that is same.
‘Let me play Madden football, allow me play EA Hockey,’ said Geoff Freeman, head of the American Gaming Association. ‘ We’ll put $20 down, the winner gets $15 and the homely house gets $5.’
However, casino experts explain that these sorts of experiences will probably only add up to a niche market in the industry. All things considered, they do say, casinos still make far more money when gamblers play against them than if they simply take on each other.